|
|
本帖最后由 傀傀 于 2010-1-25 18:26 编辑
盯了好几天也没见有人发个经验，据说天分有1200人应考呃。。
算是攒个RP吧
能记住的也不多了
一：常识部分（大概15~20道）：考了蔡伦造纸的时期（东汉）；19世纪30年代DNA双螺旋模型诞生预示着什么时代的到来（分子生物学）；诗歌史上的双子星座（李白和杜甫）。。类似这样的人文方面的知识
二：语言理解（15道左右）：段意概括，看看公务员的语言理解题就没问题了。
三：图形推理（两道题）：非常非常简单，复习的时候这部分题不用太下功夫，基本上是一看就能看出规律的。
四：定义推理（10~15道）：建行的这部分题形式不比公务员，建行的变化不是很大，很多题都是按照给出的条件交叉筛选一下就出结果了，比如有道题是：小A要相亲，条件：个子高，博士。有四位男士，B、D、E、F，B和D个子一样高，B、E、F其中有个博士。。一共四个条件罗列，考生进行推理。具体的条件我记不大清了，就是给大家看一下题型。
五：数字推理（4道题）：二级等差的没有，考查a3与a1，a2两个数字之间关系的形式多，比如a3=a2^2-a1，也是具体的忘记了，给大家看个题型。
六：数量关系（10道，0.5/道）：简单的数学计算，有点小智力的感觉。上来是排列组合，之后有速度问题，差量问题等等，有道题我记得比较清楚。
甲乙丙三人手中各有一些球，甲给丙与丙手中数量相等的球，给乙与乙手中数量相等的球，同理，第二次丙这样给甲跟乙，第三次乙这样给甲跟丙，问甲手中最初有多少球？
七：时事（15道左右）：
考了目前经济对策方面的问题，这个具体题目我忘了，只记得题干提到温家宝提出积极政策和适度的货币政策什么的。
还有9月16日，日本民主党代表鸠山由纪夫当选为日本第93代、第60位首相（下划线为考点）
建行2009的核心资本，同比增长率；所有者权益总额，同比增长率；以及建行在港市和中资银行中的排名：
“中证网讯 24日中国建设银行消息称，在近日由亚洲权威的社会责任分析评估机构“CSR ASIA”公布的「2009年亚洲可持续发展排名」中，建设银行荣登在香港上市的中国公司排名第三位，列中资银行之首，充分肯定了建设银行多年来在积极履行社会责任方面所做出的努力。”
除了跟建行有关的，剩下的在网上找找当年考研政治时事点捋一遍应该就没问题了。
八：专业部分（80道左右）：单选50，多选30，多选1分/道。
1.财管考到筹资总额分配点，这个题是给了表格，让你计算的，并不复杂，但是知识点一定要记清楚。
2.管理会计考到后悔值法，让你用后悔值法选择最优的。其实这个也属于财管。
3.会计考到会计政策和估计变更那里的知识点：选项中哪些是会计政策变更，有投资性房地产的后续计量由成本计量模式改为公允价值计量模式，存货的期末计价方式等。。也是五个选项，这个题目中级会计实务里很常见。
4.还考到以下哪个指标要考虑到风险因素：有个有关股票的指标，还有个选项是“企业价值”，剩下两个选项我忘了-。-。。
5.管理学方面的知识点有道题是这样的：给了段材料，让你选择题目所讲人员属于什么类型的管理，有“乡村俱乐部”型，有“无为而治”型，还有“传统权威型”（不知是不是这个，意思就是过于自我集权那样的），还有个“任务指导”型
还考了：一个企业做多元化的产品，又卖手机，又卖电脑什么的，忽然发现某种产品的收益递减，而且给企业带来负担，决定把这部分产业分割出去，出售还是怎样忘了。。依据某个个理论（名称忘了），什么情况下产品要采取缩小份额的策略，选项有“市场份额减小”“竞争对手增多”等四个选项
6.经济学考到了边际效用方面的，不过不深，就是有关两个效用指标的递增递减关系。判断是同方向还是反方向。
7.我是会计学专业的，没有接触过数量经济学，基本上这部分题只能蒙了，题目都看不懂。。
有道多选题是考验真矩阵，问以下哪个是验真矩阵什么的（汗。。现在回忆起来，题目都忘了。。）：选项有DW，t矩阵和f矩阵综合法，还有个Ach什么的，一共五个选项。。
8.说实话，计算机的题目做起来都比数量经济学顺手。
防火墙基于什么结构
C/S和B/S的特性和比较
TCP协议的特点：需要几次握手，缓冲可否存储等等
注：专业知识方面不管单选多选都是把数量经济学和计算机内容放在了那部分的最后考查
九：英语阅读（三篇15题）：我从网上找了题目来，没有答案，大家看看难易程度。不是很难，考前看些英文的东西，找找语感就可以，不要到时候看到字母就晕。因为这部分题是在最后，前面140道题，什么方面的都有，说实话，做的时候真的有点恶心了。
A
SOME of the concerns surrounding Turkey’s application to join the European Union, to be voted on by the EU’s Council of Ministers on December 17th, are economic-in particular, the country’s relative poverty. Its GDP per head is less than a third of the average for the 15 pre-2004 members of the EU. But it is not far off that of one of the ten new members which joined on May 1st 2004 (Latvia), and it is much the same as those of two countries, Bulgaria and Romania, which this week concluded accession talks with the EU that could make them full members on January 1st 2007.
Furthermore, the country’s recent economic progress has been, according to Donald Johnston, the secretary-general of the OECD, "stunning". GDP in the second quarter of the year was 13.4% higher than a year earlier, a rate of growth that no EU country comes close to matching. Turkey’s inflation rate has just fallen into single figures for the first time since 1972, and this week the country reached agreement with the IMF on a new three-year, $10 billion economic programme that will, according to the IMF’s managing director, Rodrigo Rato, "help Turkey... reduce inflation toward European levels, and enhance the economy’s resilience".
Resilience has not historically been the country’s economic strong point. As recently as 2001, GDP fell by over 7%. It fell by more than 5% in 1994, and by just under 5% in 1999. Indeed, throughout the 1990s growth oscillated like an electrocardiogram recording a violent heart attack. This irregularity has been one of the main reasons (along with red tape and corruption) why the country has failed dismally to attract much-needed foreign direct investment.
Its stock of such investment (as a percentage of GDP) is lower now than it was in the 1980s, and annual inflows have scarcely ever reached $1 billion (whereas Ireland attracted over $25 billion in 2003, as did Brazil in every year from 1998 to 2000).
One deterrent to foreign investors is due to disappear on January 1st 2005. On that day, Turkey will take away the right of virtually every one of its citizens to call themselves a millionaire. Six noughts will be removed from the face value of the lira; one unit of the local currency will henceforth be worth what 1m are now-ie, about ?0.53 ($0.70). Goods will have to be priced in both the new and old lira for the whole of the year, but foreign bankers and investors can begin to look forward to a time in Turkey when they will no longer have to juggle mentally with indeterminate strings of zeros.
Economist; 12/18/2004, Vol. 373 Issue 8406, p115-115, 2/5p
注(1)：本文选自Economist；12/18/2004, p115-115, 2/5p；
1_What is Turkey’s economic situation now?
[A] Its GDP per head is far lagging behind that of the EU members.
[B] Its inflation rate is still rising.
[C] Its economy grows faster than any EU member.
[D] Its economic resilience is very strong.
2_We can infer from the second paragraph that__________.
[A] Turkey will soon catch the average GDP level of the 15 pre-2004 EU members
[B] inflation rate in Turkey used to be very high
[C] Turkey’s economy will keep growing at present rate
[D] IMF’s economic program will help Turkey join the EU
3_The word “oscillated” (Line 3, Paragraph 3) most probably means_________.
[A] fell
[B] climbed
[C] developed
[D] swang
4_Speaking of Turkey’s foreign direct investment, the author implies that_________.
[A] it’s stock is far less than that of other countries
[B] it does not have much influence on Turkey’s economic progress
[C] steady GDP growth will help Turkey attract more foreign direct investment
[D] Turkey’s economic resilience relies on foreign direct investment
5_We can draw a conclusion from the text that__________.
[A] foreign investment environment in Turkey will become better
[B] Turkey’s citizens will suffer heavy loss due to the change of the face value of the lira
[C] the local currency will depreciate with the removal of six noughts from the face value
[D] prices of goods will go up
B
In the case of mobile phones, change is everything. Recent research indicates that the mobile phone is changing not only our culture, but our very bodies as well.
First. Let’s talk about culture. The difference between the mobile phone and its parent, the fixed-line phone, you get whoever answers it.
This has several implications. The most common one, however, and perhaps the thing that has changed our culture forever, is the “meeting” influence. People no longer need to make firm plans about when and where to meet. Twenty years ago, a Friday night would need to be arranged in advance. You needed enough time to allow everyone to get from their place of work to the first meeting place. Now, however, a night out can be arranged on the run. It is no longer “see you there at 8”, but “text me around 8 and we’ll see where we all are”.
Texting changes people as well. In their paper, “insights into the Social and Psychological Effects of SMS Text Messaging”, two British researchers distinguished between two types of mobile phone users: the “talkers” and the “texters”-those who prefer voice to text message and those who prefer text to voice.
They found that the mobile phone’s individuality and privacy gave texters the ability to express a whole new outer personality. Texters were likely to report that their family would be surprised if they were to read their texts. This suggests that texting allowed texters to present a self-image that differed from the one familiar to those who knew them well.
Another scientist wrote of the changes that mobiles have brought to body language. There are two kinds that people use while speaking on the phone. There is the “speakeasy”: the head is held high, in a self-confident way, chatting away. And there is the “spacemaker”: these people focus on themselves and keep out other people.
Who can blame them? Phone meetings get cancelled or reformed and camera-phones intrude on people’s privacy. So, it is understandable if your mobile makes you nervous. But perhaps you needn’t worry so much. After all, it is good to talk.
81 when people plan to meet nowadays, they
A．arrange the meeting place beforehand
B．postpone fixing the place till last minute
C．seldom care about when and where to meet
D．still love to work out detailed meeting plans.
82 According to the two British researchers, the social and psychological effect are mostly likely to be seen on
A．TALKERS
B．the "speakeasy"
C．the “spacemaker”
D．texters
83 We can infer from the passage that the texts sent by texters are
A．quite revealing
B．well written
C．unacceptable by others
D．shocking to others
84．according to the passage ,who is afraid of being heard while talking on the mobile
A．talkers
B．the speakeasy
C．the spacemaker
D．texters
85．an appropriate title for the passage might be
A．the SMS effect
B．cultural implication of mobile use
C． change in the use of the mobile
D．body language and the mobile phone!
C
Biologically, there is only one quality which distinguishes us from animals: the ability to laugh. In a universe which appears to be utterly devoid of humor, we enjoy this supreme luxury. And it is a luxury, for unlike any other bodily process, laughter does not seem to serve a biologically useful purpose. In a divide world, laughter is a unifying force. Human beings oppose each other on a great many issues. Nations may disagree about systems of government and human relations may be plagued by ideological factions and political camps, but we all share the ability to laugh. And laughter, in turn, depends on that most complex and subtle of all human qualities: a sense of humor Certain comic stereotypes have a universal appeal. This can best be seen from the world-wide popularity of Charlie Chaplin’s early films. The little man at odds with society never fails to amuse no matter which country we come from. As that great commentator on human affairs, Dr. Samuel Johnson, once remarked, ‘Men have been wise in very different modes; but they have always laughed in the same way.’
A sense of humor may take various forms and laughter may be anything from a refined tingle to an earth quaking roar, but the effect is always the same. Humor helps us to maintain a correct sense of values. It is the one quality which political fanatics appear to lack. If we can see the funny side, we never make the mistake of taking ourselves too seriously. We are always reminded that tragedy is not really far removed from comedy, so we never get a lop sided view of things.
This is one of the chief functions of satire and irony. Human pain and suffering are so grim; we hover so often on the brink of war; political realities are usually enough to plunge us into total despair. In such circumstances, cartoons and satirical accounts of somber political events redress the balance. They take the wind out of pompous and arrogant politicians who have lost their sense of proportion. They enable us to see that many of our most profound actions are merely comic or absurd. We laugh when a great satirist like Swift writes about war in Gulliver’s Travels. The Lilliputians and their nei ** ors attack each other because they can’t agree which end to break an egg. We laugh because we meant to laugh; but we are meant to weep too. It is too powerful a weapon to be allowed to flourish.
The sense of humor must be singled out as man’s most important quality because it is associated with laughter. And laughter, in turn, is associated with happiness. Courage, determination, initiative – these are qualities we share with other forms of life. But the sense of humor is uniquely human. If happiness is one of the great goals of life, then it is the sense of humor that provides the key.
1. The most important of all human qualities is
[A] a sense of humor.
[B] A sense of satire.
[C] A sense of laughter.
[D] A sense of history.
2. The author mentions about Charlie Chaplin’s early films because
[A] they can amuse people.
[B] Human beings are different from animals.
[C] They show that certain comic stereotypes have a universal appeal.
[D] They show that people have the same ability to laugh.
3. One of the chief functions of irony and satire is
[A] to show absurdity of actions.
[B] to redress balance.
[C] to take the wind out of politicians.
[D] to show too much grimness in the world.
4. What do we learn from the sentence ‘it is too powerful a weapon to be allowed to flourish in totalitarian regimes?’
[A] It can reveal the truth of political events with satire.
[B] It can arouse people to riot.
[C] It shows tragedy and comedy are related.
[D] It can make people laugh.
5. Who is Swift?
[A] A novelist.
[B] A poet.
[C] A dramatist.
[D] A essayist.
希望能给大家一点帮助，我今年准备建行的笔试也费了好大功夫找这些资料，但是天分这边过往的斗士们好像就没什么动静
祝以后的学弟学妹们能有个好前景，也祝本次参加考试的各位同胞们都能有个好结果
最后，新年即将来临，祝大家新年快乐~嘿
转载的话，劳烦各位注明一下是傀傀撰，谢过~ |
+10
|
/1 
发表于 2010-1-24 22:01
收藏